Ask the Experts
INDEX
ASK
PANEL
JOIN
COMMENT
SEARCH
September 27, 2023 - Updated
February 26, 2020 - Originally Posted

Wet Based Stencil Cleaning or Dry Wipe Stencil Cleaning



For automatic under-stencil cleaning there are many cleaning methods including dry vacuum cleaning, and wet dry vacuum cleaning. What factors should we consider to select wet-based cleaning vs. dry-based wiping?

Is it related to the amount of residual inside the aperture walls and the bleed out under the stencil?

What are the typical cleaning cycles for both cleaning methods?

I heard from some printer experts who say wet-based cleaning removes the flux from the stencil aperture walls and this flux enhances the paste release through the stencil, therefore they want to minimize the usage of wet-based cleaning.

S.A

Expert Panel Responses

There are many ideas on this subject. From my experience as a onetime solder paste developer is the stencil cleaning chemical compatible with the solder paste that is being used. If it is not you may create a gooey mess that will not remove paste residue easily. This will lead to insufficient prints as the paste will stick in the aperture and the next print will be insufficient.

Assuming the chemistries are compatible, and vacuum is available, wet wipe then dry wipe then vacuum wipe. In the absence of vacuum; wet wipe thane dry wipe.

If you are still having solder paste release issues, poor print from blead out or insufficient deposits, remove the stencil and check the bottom for dried paste or coined on solder spheres. This can be removed with a razor blade if needed be.

image
Karl Seelig

Deck Street Consultants
In his 32 years of industry experience, Mr. Seelig has authored over 30 published articles on topics including lead-free assembly, no-clean technology, and process optimization. Karl holds numerous patents, including four for lead-free solder alloys, and was a key developer of no-clean technology.

I would only recommend wet clean, then vac, then Dry. Using a 50gsm material not 68gsm. Seen too many Dry wipe, Vac, Wipe just smear the Paste powder underneath the Stencil, causing all kinds of issues, even bridging in the worst cases.

image
Greg York
Technical Sales Manager
BLT Circuit Services Ltd
Greg York has over thirty two years of service in Electronics industry. York has installed over 600 Lead Free Lines in Europe with Solder and flux systems as well as Technical Support on SMT lines and trouble shooting.

Underside stencil cleaning should be performed based on the solder paste supplier's recommendations. We recommend using a 3 part cleaning process including a wet wipe followed by 2 dry wipes with vacuum. It is important to use an appropriate solvent for the wet wipe to loosen and remove the solder paste from the bottom of the stencil.

It is likely that some of the solvent will mix with the solder paste inside the apertures, and it is important that the solvent contaminated solder paste be removed from the apertures. That removal is accomplished through two dry wipes with vacuum.

The material used for wiping will also affect this cleaning process. Some materials are better at trapping and holding solder paste than others. I suggest working with your cleaning chemical supplier and wipe supplier to get the optimal cleaning and wiping materials for the solder pastes used.

image
Tony Lentz
Field Applications
FCT Assembly
Tony has worked in the electronics industry since 1994. He worked as a process engineer at a circuit board manufacturer for 5 years. Since 1999, Tony has worked for FCT Companies as a laboratory manager, facility manager, and most recently a field application engineer. He has extensive experience doing research and development, quality control, and technical service with products used to manufacture and assemble printed circuit boards. He holds B.S. and M.B.S. degrees in Chemistry.

I've always used a combination of wet & dry. Many of the newer model printers allow you to choose any combination but before you choose there some questions you should answer to determine your cleaning process:
  1. Type of stencil - regular etch, laser etched or electro-formed.
  2. Does the stencil aperture walls have any special coating to help release of solder paste?
  3. Are there any fine pitch components on your board?
  4. Are there any BGA's?
  5. Last but not least - are you using the correct solder paste for your application?

Having the answer to these questions will help you determine the best under stencil cleaning for your process. For example, in my case, I have laser-etched stencil, 21 mil pitch components, 2 large BGA's and type 3 NC solder paste. We set the stencil at Wet, Wet, Vacuum, Dry; every 10 assemblies and have no issues.

image
Edithel Marietti
Senior Manufacturing Engineer
Northrop Grumman
Edithel is a chemical engineer with 20 year experience in manufacturing & process development for electronic contract manufacturers in US as well as some major OEM's. Involved in SMT, Reflow, Wave and other assembly operations entailing conformal coating and robotics.

Reader Comment
The most important factor is the type of solder paste flux you wish to use. All of the experts have good comments, but the most important one is to discuss this with your paste vendor. Yes, having a little bit of soluble flux left behind can help with paste release, but the caveat is that it depends on HOW LONG that water soluble flux is left on. If more than a few minutes it will do more harm (entrapment from being sticky) than in promoting release.

Conversely, if you are using a no-clean or RMA-based flux in your solder paste, well then you certainly want those apertures be completely clean and dry after each print, because those fluxes can be incredibly sticky right out of the container. It is far better to depend on a good stencil with a good final nanofinish for paste release properties, that is the second most important factor. Once you have those two factors covered, then the sequence of wet/dry wiping is easily easily evaluated and qualified to see which works best for each paste/flux type.
Odin Stadheim, Skarnes Teknik AS

Submit A Comment

Comments are reviewed prior to posting. You must include your full name to have your comments posted. We will not post your email address.

Your Name


Your Company
Your E-mail


Your Country
Your Comments



Free Newsletter Subscription
Circuitnet is built for professionals who bear the responsibility of looking ahead, imagining the future, and preparing for it.

Insert Your Email Address