Ask the Experts
September 2, 2014 - Updated
June 12, 2013 - Originally Posted

PoP Assembly Options

Which of the following is suggested for (PoP) package on package assembly?

Option 1: Use a fixture to support the lower package, reflow the top package on the bottom package. Then place the PoP on the main circuit board and reflow with all other components.

Option 2: Place all components, including the bottom package of the PoP on the circuit board and reflow. Then place the top package of the PoP and reflow with modified ramp and zone reflow profile.

Any suggestions or references would be appreciated.


Expert Panel Responses

I would go withoption 1, the assembly process first, putting all the components together andverifying they are ok prior to placing them as an assembly on the printedboard. This also allows the use of a different solder alloy to mount thetwo components together, which would be problematic with mounting them all atthe same time. Assembling themtogether would allow many changes of misalignment due to vibration of theequipment and conveyor.

Leo Lambert
Vice President, Technical Director
EPTAC Corporation
At EPTAC Corporation, Mr. Lambert oversees content of course offerings, IPC Certification programs and provides customers with expert consultation in electronics manufacturing, including RoHS/WEEE and lead free issues. Leo is also the IPC General Chairman for the Assembly/Joining Process Committee.

Consider Option 3 for high volumeprocesses - Place all components in normal SMT, including the bottom package.Then place the top package after a flux dip. Reflow in a normal SMT process. The flux method for the top package would besimilar to a pin transfer method using gel flux. I believe there are some pickn place manufacturers who are making equipment for this type of process.

Stephen Schoppe
Process Sciences, Inc.
Stephen Schoppe is President of Process Sciences, Inc., and has 19 years experience providing SMT services to electronics manufacturers. Stephen provides consulting to several Fortune 500 clients on solder and SMT processes, and is a frequent guest speaker at SMT industry events.

Of the two options presented, Option 1 results in one lessreflow cycle for the entire assembly, and that is a good thing. I would suggestthat there is also a third option: mount the top POP package (using tacky flux)during the same placement program as the bottom package, and reflow together.This would require a film fluxer or other means of rapidly, accurately fluxingthe component. I do not know which approach is most commonly used today, however if Iwere implementing the process, I would prefer this third option due to thecombination of process flexibility, reduction of reflow cycles, and reductionof labor/time.

Fritz Byle
Process Engineer
Fritz's career in electronics manufacturing has included diverse engineering roles including PWB fabrication, thick film print & fire, SMT and wave/selective solder process engineering, and electronics materials development and marketing. Fritz's educational background is in mechanical engineering with an emphasis on materials science. Design of Experiments (DoE) techniques have been an area of independent study. Fritz has published over a dozen papers at various industry conferences.
Submit A Comment

Comments are reviewed prior to posting. You must include your full name to have your comments posted. We will not post your email address.

Your Name

Your Company
Your E-mail

Your Country
Your Comments

Free Newsletter Subscription
Circuitnet is built for professionals who bear the responsibility of looking ahead, imagining the future, and preparing for it.

Insert Your Email Address