| Ask the Experts |
|
|
November 5, 2006 - Updated
July 4, 2007 - Originally Posted
Is "Cost per placement" key factor
I've built a matrix for evaluating a new placement line. Should "Cost per Placement" be the key factor if all other specifications meet our needs?
D.G.
|
| Expert Panel Responses |
Cost per placement is one factor, but total cost of ownership may be a better benchmark to use. Make sure all machines give you actual speeds for your test board, and give a money back guarantee that those speeds can be achieved. If you don't have a test board, use the IPC standard test board. Many suppliers have unfortunately returned to the days of grossly exaggerated "cycle rates". Be careful and make them all prove it.
Bob Black
North America Sales Manager
Essegi Automation
Mr. Black was the President and Co-Founder of Zevatech in 1977 and introduced first Pick and Place System at Nepcon West 1980. Bob is now the President, CEO and Co-Founder of Juki Automation Systems. He is also a Co-Founder of the SMEMA Council of IPC. He serves as a member of SMTA and SEMI..
|
|
Submit A Comment
|
Comments are reviewed prior to posting. You must include your full name to have your comments posted. We will not post your email address.
|
Free Newsletter Subscription
Circuitnet is built for professionals who bear the responsibility of looking ahead, imagining the future, and preparing for it.
Insert Your Email Address
|
| Sponsor |
|
Inline Automatic X-Ray Inspection: TruView™ Verus
TruView™ Verus is a high-resolution inline AXI system offering advanced 2D, 2.5D, and 3D imaging to detect defects in electronic assemblies with exceptional accuracy and speed.
Creative Electron
|
|
|
