|
|
|
Can Silver or Gold Filled Epoxies Replace Solder?
Board Talk
TranscriptPhil Today's question is: "can conductive epoxies be considered a viable RoHS substitute for tin lead solder?" It's a question that's been asked many times over the ages, especially since the original advent of RoHS appearing on the horizon. It's something we've touched on before in one of our other diatribes on conductive epoxy. Fundamentally yeah, you could consider it, but from a practical standpoint, not really. This was originally examined back in the early days of getting ready for RoHS. Motorola Schaumberg IL, did some major investigation into this at the time and they decided - no. There's a number of limitations with conductive epoxies regarding how they fare in terms of robustness compared to tin lead solder. Jim, do you want to elaborate on that a little bit? Jim Other issues that are raised are difficulties reworking, and some of the structural properties. Depending upon what your failure modes are, in some cases the epoxies can be more robust. But in others, cycling or vibration and so forth, they are less robust. The final issue is cost. Most of the ones that work successfully are filled with silver or gold. Silver is expensive. Phil, did that Motorola study have a rough estimate, even back in those days when metals were cheap? Phil Jim Phil But when you start cross sectioning, at least in its present state it's not a great idea. But remember, things tend to change and improve, so, you never know. And with that, we say thank you for tuning in to Board Talk and this is Jim Hall and Phil Zarrow saying whatever you do... Jim Phil Comments
Aug 30, 2017
All I can say is... Blimey not again!!!!!
Mike Firmstone, TecKonnect International
Nov 9, 2009
Interesting talk on conductive epoxies. We have looked at this for many years, we used high volume Ag filled epoxies from the 1970's. This has reduced over the years due to changes in chip packaging/hybrid assembly. We saw no significant problems with using Ag epoxies even in extended life trials. Problem is price. Price problem is embarrassment. Majority of conductive epoxies are used in mil/hi-rel applications.
The few main suppliers have milked this business since 1960's. I can only use the last data I have (from 2001) but at that time the main US supplier was selling their Ag epoxy for about $1.75 per gram, main Asian source US$1.35 per gram. Both said these were competitive prices! At that time I was buying high purity electronic grade epoxies for about $0.003 per gram and Ag flake or powder for $0.15 per gram. I spoke often to the main manufacturers to try to get them to reduce pricing to an acceptable level. I compared total cost of ownership of 96S solder or Ag epoxy as solder replacement for lead attach. The process savings using epoxy was enormous. No fluxing, reflow,cleaning just relatively low temperature curing. Bottom line was we were willing to pay over $0.50 per gram. Volume would have been huge. No main supplier was interested. 4 times we had small epoxy manufacturers OEM the material to our specifications. Each supplier either went out of business, was taken over or had "changes in strategic direction" after a few months manufacturing. Basically we gave up and looked at other ways to increase soldering efficiencies. I don't think we will ever have reasonable pricing in this sector due to the high historical margins for the suppliers.
Allan Dowie, BI Technologies Ltd
|
||||||||
|
Free Newsletter Subscription
Circuitnet is built for professionals who bear the responsibility of looking ahead, imagining the future, and preparing for it. Insert Your Email Address |
|
|