Circuitnet Logo
   We search for industry news, so you don't need to.
February 9, 2012
Circulation Over 51,000
Ask the Experts Index
You submit the questions, our Panel of Experts submit the answers.
Questions  I   Submit a Question  I   Experts Panel  I   Join the Panel
May 26, 2009

Which term to use, PWB or PCB?

Is there any real difference between the terms Printed Wire Board (PWB) and Printed Circuit Board (PCB)?

Which do you recommend we use for internal and external documents?

R. D.

Experts Comments

PCB gets my vote

image
Steven Adamson
Market Specialist
Nordson ASYMTEK
Market Specialist for Nordson ASYMTEK. Mr. Adamson worked for Kodak, Motorola and Plessey, ICL in the UK with 5 US and 2 UK patents. He was awarded a HNC in electrical engineering and was 2008 President of IMAPS. Mr. Adamson was a respected mentor in the electronics industry. He passed away October, 2011. Learn about the Steve Adamson Memorial Annual Scholarship Fund.

No Real difference. PCB is the more modern term.

image
Gary Goldberg
President and CEO
PROMATION, Inc.
Mr Goldberg has practical experience in production line layout, process flow and cycle rate analysis. He knows how to avoid bottle necks and most related PCB or pallet handling questions.

Most of the industry uses PCB. So that would be the term for me.

image
Edward Zamborsky
Regional Sales Manager
OK International Inc.
Mr. Zamborsky serves as one of OK's technology advisers to the Product Development group. Ed has authored articles and papers on topics such as; Low Volume SMT Assembly, Solder Fume Extraction, SMT Rework, BGA Rework, Lead Free Hand Soldering, Lead Free Visual Inspection and Lead Free Array Rework.

Great question.

IPC-T-50H, has a definition for each of these terms,

Printed Circuit Board, provides both point-to–point connections and printed components in a predetermined arrangement on a common base.

Printed Wiring Board, provides point-to-point connections but not printed components in a predetermined arrangement on a common base.

There is a difference between the two, but I would say the industry has used the term interchangeably throughout the history of electronic manufacturing.

Left to my devices all raw boards coming from the board shops should be called Printed Wiring Boards.

image
Leo Lambert
Vice President, Technical Director
EPTAC Corporation
At EPTAC Corporation, Mr. Lambert oversees content of course offerings, IPC Certification programs and provides customers with expert consultation in electronics manufacturing, including RoHS/WEEE and lead free issues. Leo is also the IPC General Chairman for the Assembly/Joining Process Committee.

This question has been discussed numerous times at IPC meetings and usually enables a fair amount of emotion.

All of the following are possible uses, depending on your age, geographic location (slang usage), and where/how you got your training. I'm sure there are more.

PB - printed board. the most generic term for a bare board

PWB - printed wiring board, one of the first uses when the issue was only a point to point connection.

PCB - printed circuit board, where the width, side to side and multi-layer relationship(spacing) of conductor runs has or is designed to have a specific effect on circuit operation other than just a point to point connection. Circuit impedance is a primary issue. In approximately 1999 the IPC Technical Activities Executive Committee made a mandate to only use the term PCB for all new document development because more often than not the printed circuitry design will have an impact on function.

PWA - printed wire assembly - older use

PCA - printed circuit assembly - logical to use with the 1999 change to PCB.

PCBA - printed circuit board assembly - multiplerequests/comments (strong push) from users and technical committees in Asia and Europe to use this as the preferred term.

Embedded active or passive components opens up a whole new range of possibilities as well.

While it would be good to have a single term (or pair of terms for bare boards and assemblies) reality is that there are many IPCdocuments of various age using different terms and many more book and magazine article authors, conference lecturers, etc., that pretty much use whatever term they are most comfortable with.

If preparing a document; it would be appropriate to use a term that most of the expected users would understand. In the world of electronics technology, it would seem that most usersshould be able to understand the content when any of these terms are used.

image
Jack Crawford
Director - Certification & Assembly Technology
IPC
Mr. Crawford is Director of Certification and Assembly Technology for IPC. He is technical liaison to the IPC committees that maintain critical industry standards and has presented numerous papers internationally.
Additional Comments
No additional comments have been submitted.

Submit a comment - Add to the discussion.

Your Name
Your Email
Company
Country
Comment
  All comments are reviewed prior to posting. We will only post a comment that includes a name and company. You will receive an email if your comments are posted.
 
Home  |  About Us  |  Advertising  |  Advertising Rates  |  Ask the Experts  |  Calendar  |  Contact Us  |  Free Subscription
Industry Forums  |  Exclusives  |  Letters  |  News  |  Press Releases  |  Viewpoint  |  White Papers

Search Category       Search Term   
To search a phrase, place it in quotes.
We search for industry news so you don't need to.

Circuitnet LLC, 22 Parkridge Road, Haverhill, MA 01835 USA
Copyright © 2012 Circuitnet.    All rights reserved.
Jeff Ferry, Publisher  | Ken Cavallaro, Business Manager

Semiconductor Packaging News - Semiconductor and advanced packaging news and information.