Circuitnet Logo
   We search for industry news, so you don't need to.
 
Home  I  Site Map  I  News  I  Corporate News  I  Exclusives  I  Experts  I  Equipment  I  Circuitmart  I  Calendar




Announcements/Exclusive Articles Index
Exclusive

April 30, 2007

Post AOI, X-ray or In-Line Test Handling Considerations

image
Gary Goldberg, President & CEO, PROMATION
Many manufacturers are finding that to improve quality output, they need to incorporate a post-production inspection system. Three such technologies are available with the first being an automated optical inspection system (AOI), the second being X-ray, and the third being an in-line test cell.

After selecting the technology that best fits the manufacturer’s process, the only remaining decision is to define the process flow for PASS/FAIL disposition, repair/rework, and reintroduction of the reworked product into the line.

The purpose of this article is to share some of the most common manufacturing options for handling product post inspection/test, and considerations for sorting the product after inspection/test as it relates to the desired process flow, based upon disposition status.

Considerations
***image5***Manufacturers deploying inspection or quality test systems need to consider how implementing such processes might affect overall line flow, cycle times, floor space requirements, and operator interface (cost/time). The selected equipment also must be capable of providing SMEMA interface, as well as PASS/FAIL communication (generally across pins 5 & 6 within the SMEMA cable) to sorting equipment.

Process Considerations
image
In-line workstation with sorting capability
A variety of either semi-automated or fully automated solutions are available, with each having a different personnel requirement (batch or dedicated). These solutions may include:

  • In-line work station with PASS/FAIL sorting / operator walk up upon alarm
  • In-line magazine station with PASS/FAIL sorting / used for offline batch rework
  • In-line 90° turn and sort with work station or accumulation / Operator stationed
  • In-line inspection station for high-volume, multi PCB buffering and PCB reintroduction
  • In-line rework loop through the use of sorting shuttles / reintroduces rework for inspection.

Conclusion
The ability to plan how suspect production will be handled is a key factor when considering the overall inspection sorting package. For low- to mid-volume shops or for paste inspection systems, the simple in-line workstation solution may work best. For higher volume shops or final inspection, the production manager may want to select either a continuous flow rework loop or magazine batch process for secondary inspection/repair. Finally, keep in mind that each solution has different demands of floor personnel that should be considered.

Gary Goldberg, President
PROMATION, Inc.

This page has been viewed 397 times.


Comments

Letter to the Editor
Do you have a comment to offer? Use the form below.

Letter Title
Your Name
Your Company
Your Email
Comment
Hyperlink
If your letter refers to an article we ran, please include the hyperlink to the original article above.


 







Home  |   About Us  |   Advertising  |   Advertising Rates  |   Archives  |   Ask the Experts  |   Calendar  |   Corporate News  |   Contact Us
Free Subscription  |   Industry Forums  |   Equipment Mart  |   Exclusives  |   Letters  |   Circuitmart  |   News  |   Site Map  |   Viewpoint  |   White Papers


Search Category       Search Term   
To search a phrase, place it in quotes.
We search for industry news so you don't need to.

Circuitnet LLC, 135 Ward Hill Avenue, Haverhill, MA 01835 USA
Copyright © 2008 Circuitnet.    All rights reserved.
Jeff Ferry, Publisher  | Ken Cavallaro, Business Manager

Visit Semiconductor Packaging News for the latest semiconductor and advanced packaging news and information.