
We search for industry news, so you don't need to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 7, 2006
Problems with defect BGA connections on large BGA's and on ENIG plated boards
We are an EMS. Lately we are facing a new challenge. Our customers send us RMA's with defect BGA connections but only on large BGA's and on ENIG plated boards from the same board manufacturer. We experienced these defects with at least two different customers. The defect is always at the same large BGA's and in the same area prone to mechanical stresses after component assembly.
The assemblies are mechanically mounted at the customer's facilities. Our printed circuit supplier does not accept our complaint that the finish is not suitable. Our customers don't want to try another finish like immersion silver, and also sustain that their design is good.
We are in the middle of all this, and really upset. Our profile is checked for these large BGA's and is according to the component manufacturer's requirements. In our facility we do not exercise any mechanical stresses in the vicinity of the failed area. What to do?
G.B.
This "Ask the Experts" page has been viewed 1105 times.
Ask the Experts Comments
May 10, 2006
The industry is starting to recognize this as a systematic problem. For reasons currently unknown, BGAs assembled to ENIG-plated boards that are exposed to a second reflow operation periodically experience a severe weakness in the solder joint or, in more extreme cases, dewetting. If you could send me some images of this defect, I can give you some feedback if this is indeed your affliction.
Dr. Craig D. Hillman, CEO & Managing Partner
DfR Solutions
chillman@dfrsolutions.com
Dr. Hillman's specialties include best practices in Design for Reliability, strategies for transitioning to Pb-free, supplier qualification (commodity and engineered products), passive component technology and printed board failure mechanisms. Dr. Hillman has over 30 publications and has presented on a wide variety of reliability issues to over 150 companies and organizations.
|
May 10, 2006
I have seen this type of problem before. Although you may or may not be mechanically stressing it, it is likely it is being stressed during handling, packaging, shipping or when your customer is handling it. Unless it is a backplane and extremely rigid this would likely be the culprit. The solution is handling and storing the boards on a flat surface. ESD safe plastic trays are the best way, as the board is fully supported on a flat surface. The operators are handling the tray, not the board, the board will never see stress. You and your customer need to use the same method for handling. The prior industry method before trays and tray carts was carts or racks with slotted side panels and the boards would hang from two edges and sag in the middle and frequently fracture solder joints on BGA’s and or circuits. These older rack methods are still around, but the industry is changing. You can get trays and tray carts from a variety of companies, including mine.
I hope this solves the problem for you.
Ken Bliss, President & CEO
Bliss Industries, Inc.
kbliss@blissindustries.com
Mr. Bliss has 20+ years experience creating process methods that improve profitability by maximizing hidden unused capacity and throughput. The Feeder Staging Station earned Bliss the SMT Vision Award in 1996, reducing down time during feeder changeover by 50%. Ken has expertise in all areas of manufacturing specializing in electronics assembly.
|
May 10, 2006
As a field and service rep in my past life, I have experienced the same types of situations. If either or both of the customer's facilities are close enough to your facility to allow you to visit them during the assembly stage where the failure is most likely to occur, I suggest you schedule a trip to observe the assembly procedure/methods they use. If both customer's experience the same problem having the same or similar design, then it must be in the assembly method used or the tooling they use that is causing the problem. If the problem only existed with one customer, then you could deduce that the client probably had some assembly issues especially so if other clients used the same methods and design without problems.
I hope this helps.
Robert Murphree, Owner
MurphreeDesigns.com
bobwayne@hiwaay.net
Mr. Murphee has 40+ years involved in Apollo and Shuttle programs, L-1011 Tri-star, Space Staion Docking adapter and Nasa's 6 DOF refurbishment management. His experience covers mechanical, electrical, solid state device, PLC and relay logic design and troubleshooting, electro-hydraulic circuit, hydraulic systems, steel fabrication, robitics and manipulator design.
|
May 10, 2006
You may want to try a step up stencil in the BGA area; step up to 8 mil thick.
This may help with large BGA's
Bill Coleman, Vice President Technology
Photo Stencil
bcoleman@photostencil.com
For over 18 years, Dr. Coleman has been the vice president of technology for Photo Stencil, working closely with customers to understand their printing requirements. His efforts have resulted in several new stencil products such as trapezoidal chem-etch apertures, wafer bumping stencils and DuraGlide squeegee blades.
|
May 10, 2006
In my opinion....40% of the task is materials/solderability....20% is mechanics (alignment/placement/pcb+component handling)....40% is thermal profile.
I would look at making sure your chemistry is correct....and also your thermal profiling. Are you warping the pcbs during reflow? If so, a lot of stress will be induced in your assembly...which will lead to subsequent failures. You may need to slow the preheating rate down, allowing heat to evenly perculate through the whole structure, to reduce the warping. Also the reflow temperature + soak times need to be sufficient to allow the bonding to occur...your solder manufacturer will have guidelines to follow.
Only my thoughts...
Roger Gibbs, Managing Director
PDR
rgibbs@pdr.co.uk
Twenty years ago Mr. Gibbs, Managing Director of PDR, produced the first rework system based on Focused Infra-Red (Focused IR) light energy. PDR now has a 3,500-strong global installation list with top OEMs and EMS providers, relying on PDR technology to simplify one of the riskiest, demanding and unavoidable tasks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|